|
The Bermondsey Agenda
This agenda was
put together on the 17th May 2002 following an Order of White Knights gathering
at Leather Market Gardens, London, to clarify policy.
What follows are the foundations of the Order's points of view.
1) Repatriation
We do not believe
that the call for repatriation for the sake
of all concerned parties is simplistic. It
is, however, feasible and lastly, unavoidable
.
Our view is that repatriation has to be taken on as humanely as possible,
with compensation to those affected. Those affected will be
of African/Asian and/or non white origin.
Wherever possible all means of humane methods should be explored, in particular
(if necessary) the formation of a new, self
governed black state outside our homelands
to absorb the exodus. All methods of encouraging mud self-willingness to
obtain these ends should be viewed positively.
2) Immigration
It is our considered
view that immigration leads to a general decline in living standards.
Society is too developed to be able to absorb immigrants, therefore the
capacity to retain existing living standards declines as the immigrants
replace existing jobs or find themselves in the "black economy"
or out of work. Plus the general alienation that is generated throughout
society as cultures clash leads to instability.
Further more,
from the viewpoint of our genetic heritage, it has to be noted that the
genes of a nonwhite person "integrated" into the community of
our people are destroying our racial makeup just the same as the genes
of an illegal nonwhite immigrant. Thus the fact that a nonwhite immigrant
is being considered "integrated" into our society, is secondary.
We therefore call on the government to completely
halt the immigration of muds, and only to permit immigration of Whites,
if society faces a lack of skills and human resources, since it is our
view that White Immigration is more integrationist and
far less destructive than nonwhite immigration.
We reject the call for mud immigration due to an aging population, rather
the state should encourage the rate of child births of existing Whites.
To ensure that this encouragement is focused
on Whites exclusively, the state should enact legislation that prevents
nonwhite immigrants from benefiting of said governmental help.
3) Geo-Nationalism
We hold the view
that all Whites are descended from a common ancestry. Whites have shown
themselves, throughout history, to be well adapted to the civilising dynamism
that is required to sustain a permanent state of progressive development.
As Whites settled into varying regions of the world, with different environments,
they developed similar cultures and core beliefs. Therefore, we oppose
Geo-Nationalist views which in the extreme case will
lead to fratricide. As evident during the last two world wars of the 20th
century, where capitalist forces played on Geo-Nationalist divisions and
forced the pace of war.
4) Free Markets and Democracy
We hold the belief
that we do not live in a democracy determined by the people, rather we
live in a "pornocracy". A society governed by the alleged free
flow of capital, where the nation's assets are for sale. Capitalism, together
with the march of extreme corporate globalisation is undermining and neutralizing
the democratic checks and balances of all
nation states.
The development of European democracies since
the end of WW II clearly shows that ultimately
this globalisation trend will lead to even more
decadent behaviour, not only of the people who have lost their democratic
stake in society, but of decadent thoughts which support the exploitation
by the status quo. This will lead to social decay, and eventual economic
decay, as the people of any nation are it's greatest assets. Just like
immigration, it will lead to instability of the state and the pornocracy's
downfall.
Further to that, free markets are unstable, as they require constant intervention
to prevent excesses or contradictions, be it the lack of equilibrium or
social deprivation.
We believe in the creation of a new society based on White democratic principles
of radical participation since a real democracy
can only function if the overall genetic makeup of a population is homogenous.
Democracy by the people and for the people.
5) Law and Order
We call for a policing
policy of zero tolerance to minor (and all) crimes. All minor crimes lead
to the slippery slope of major criminality. The young should be shown the
moral guidance of the state to denounce to relevant authorities those who
seek to corrupt into criminality sections of society. The young should
be educated to high moral standards of civic responsibility. Parents who
wish to neglect this duty should be treated as responsible for the possible
resultant childs criminal activities.
The police force are too overburdened with bureaucracy to tackle crime.
We call for an increasing division between front end (Street Policing)
and back end (office) duties which will free police officers from the chains
of red tape, and once again to walk the beat and reduce crime by
being allowed to act more on their common sense.
We call for penal reforms so that we have the reintroduction of punishment
to fit the crime and the ultimate deterrent of the death penalty for serial
killers, child molesters, drug dealers, rapists
and those of a similar nature. In order to
enable the government to enact the said policing policies, the government is
urged to help the media of news and entertainment to a new work ethic which
will ensure positive cooperation instead of a constant undermining of our
people's morals.
6) Religion
We hold the view
that our forefathers sacrificed themselves in an enormous clash of faiths
to retain a Christian tradition, as is evident with reference to various
epochs of history.
This struggle was over turned during the French revolution of 1789, since
then the nation state has retained a secular position.
This could be viewed as a natural progression, however this progression
is continually being undermined by the spread of non traditional, backward
looking, religions in particularly the spread of Islam which seeks to overturn
the achievements of our crusading forefathers.
It is our view, as evident from the Soviet experience, that religion fulfills
a natural social function, since attempts to eradicate religion in the
Soviet Union failed and was ultimately to be used to undermine the Soviet
System.
Therefore, religion is a necessary part of society, and we hold the view
that the state should promote the Christian faith.
It is our view that sectarianism, which leads to Whites attacking Whites
is wrong, and therefore toleration of various Christian ethnocentric
traditions should be instilled into the young.
7) Public Services
Economies of scale
(e.g., synergies) is the key to the success of all public services, coupled
with the eradication of wasteful duplication of infrastructure which competition,
for example, in the mobile telephone industry shows. Examine the different
mobile networks and you will see waste throughout as duplicate telecommunication
equipment is used. A waste of the nations economic resources as various
companies fail.
Rather we hold the view that a new drive is needed which maximises the
potential of the Keynesian multipler and yet at the same time imposes a
rigid price fixing regime, to prevent price greed and resultant inflation.
This we feel is far better than the conspiracy of productivity from the
debt stock we have today. The economic models used by governments
do not gell together.
Alleged high national productivity (as defined in
the West as a money supply factor in the global capitalist world), should
have lead to high profits and efficiency - nothing could be further from
the truth. More like high levels of debt for the bankers to manipulate.
We feel that the definition of productivity is fundamentally flawed, and
fails basic logical analysis.
Workers, managers and politicians should form co-operative bodies to supervise
the efficient functioning of public services, reaping the windfall gained
by economies of scale.
All vital infrastructure should be re-nationalised and placed under such
bodies - so that better monitoring and performance can be obtained.
The power of
stock exchanges has to be curtailed considerably by rigid taxation on short
term speculations to the benefit of the working class.
8) The Environment
Historically Western
Society has always been seen to tame nature - no greater example can be
found then the early settlers in the New World, who for the most part found
an untamed wilderness.
What followed was generally an environmentally catastrophe
e.g. The Great Lakes. It was said in most parts that you could see the
bed of the lakes and the waters were crystal clear. Today the story is
very different. Therefore with progress came the spoils of nature.
However, in the modern world technology has reached a stage when rather
than conflicting with nature, it can work in harmony. Cleaner engines,
and the harnessing of alternative energy resources can all play their part.
All it requires is national governments to adapt their own different environments
using the technology at their disposal.
It has to be at a national level,
as no single global body could deal with the varying environmental conditions
that exist throughout the world, furthermore, it would not be democratic
otherwise. It is our view then that progress has to be done in a national
way that is in harmony with nature to improve the quality of life.
9) Bio-diversity
We believe that humans are still governed by the laws of nature, where genetic diversity is a strength, not a weakness.
We believe that race mixing in confined geo-graphic regions will ultimately remove human genetic diversity, and generate a homogenous globalised human species,
with all the same strength and weaknesses. This is dangerous in a non-linear world, where at times seperate races have come to the fore. Each race acting and behaving differently
to the environment faced. We believe that the White race is sufficiently diverse itself, and is also the hallmark of natural progress. Requiring preservation for mankind.
10) Education
Modern Society has
two major educational defects, these are as follows:
a) Inequality of education - this being education based on class background,
for example the binary divide between private and state school. The former
being deeply read and the latter being artificially constructed to satisfy
the working class, and lower middle class.
b) Constant political interference in the class room. It seems that every
new government for political expediency appears to reform the education
system, rendering any stability in education methods useless.
We hold the view that education should be flexible enough to provide for
late development, but at the same time cater for the intellectual capacities
of students, and should be done regardless of social class. Plus all students
should be educated to the highest civic standards and moral duty.
|